A Digital Exhibit

"We Humans"

Educating Pittsburgh on Race in the 1950s

In the years following World War II, global shock over the Holocaust, growing demands to end race-based discrimination, and shifting ideas in science created a charged and consequential environment for social change. This digital exhibit shares one story of how civic, labor, and education leaders in Pittsburgh responded to that moment.

Students hearing the "We Humans" curriculum, Monongahela High School, 1959. Photograph by Michel Chalufour. Courtesy of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Library & Archives.

Introduction

What feels familiar and unfamiliar about this story?

"We Humans" was an exhibit on race and racism developed by two curators of anthropology employed at the Carnegie Museum (now Carnegie Museum of Natural History), James Swauger and Don Dragoo. Through punchy rhetoric informed by current science, Swauger and Dragoo encouraged workers, students, and citizens to question their assumptions about race and to value the lives and contributions of all people. The exhibit debuted in downtown Pittsburgh in 1955 and later reached a national audience through portable versions and publications. The exhibit was a collaborative effort, jointly planned and sponsored by the museum, the labor union the United Steelworkers of America, Mayor David L. Lawrence's Civic Unity Council, and Pittsburgh Public Schools.

"We Humans" demonstrates the extent to which a version of anti-racism was being made an urgent public priority across the United States in the 1950s, but also shows the pitfalls of the institutional and scientific tactics employed in such efforts at this time. As you learn more about the story of "We Humans," ask yourself what its ambitions and shortcomings might have to teach people today.

Please note that this exhibit includes racial terminology and imagery that are outdated and offensive.
Origins

How did "We Humans" come to be?

"We Humans" emerged as one of many responses to local, national, and global conversations about race and discrimination in the 1950s. Civic, labor, religious, and community leaders, alongside academics, collaborated to counter both anti-semitism and Nazi race science, and anti-Black racism and segregation.

Of particular relevance were discussions convened by the Committee on Civil Rights of the United Steelworkers of America, and the first UNESCO Statement on Race of 1950.

United Steelworkers of America

The Civil Rights Committee of the United Steelworkers (USW), established in 1948, organized seminars where leaders in labor, education, religion, and the social sciences debated how to mitigate prejudice in the workplace and in society.

Carnegie Museum curator James Swauger was invited to a USW "Seminar on Human Relations" in 1951. He brought museum artifacts made by diverse cultural groups and — presenting them without identifying information — challenged participants to racially label or judge them. That collaboration eventually created the opportunity for "We Humans."

UNESCO Statements on Race

In December 1949, a group of academics (mostly anthropologists) gathered in Paris to draft the first UNESCO Statement on Race of 1950, aiming to eliminate racial prejudice through knowledge. Ideas about race in anthropology were slowly shifting away from harmful comparisons between groups, even as many scholars still relied on now-discredited techniques like skull measuring to categorize people. The UNESCO Statement, and later "We Humans," reflect this moment of transition.

The UNESCO Statement called racism out as a dangerous social myth not supported by science. It defined "races" as groups of humans who through geographic isolation and natural selection came to show distinct, but variable, physical traits. Nevertheless, it still named three main racial groups as known to science (none of which are recognized as accurate today): Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid.

The UNESCO Statement thus combined messages about human equality that were progressive, and actually controversial at the time, alongside ideas that are now considered out of date and offensive. A few years later, "We Humans" repeated these same tensions.

Display & Reception

Where was "We Humans" shown, and how did people respond?

July 1955

"Are You Ethnocentric?"

A Pittsburgh Sun-Telegraph editorial praised the exhibit for challenging the belief that one's own group is superior. Some readers doubled down on their sense of superiority — one even claimed the anti-ethnocentric message would lead to Communism.

"Are You Ethnocentric?," Pittsburgh Sun-Telegraph, July 8, 1955. From newspapers.com.
"Ethnocentric," Pittsburgh Sun-Telegraph, July 15, 1955. From newspapers.com.
February 1956

Into the schools

A modified, portable version tours Pittsburgh Public, parochial, and regional schools as a social-studies module. A USW-funded booklet circulated the content more broadly; the tour continued at least through 1959.

A teacher at Monongahela High School with a portable "We Humans" panel, 1959. Photograph by Michel Chalufour. Courtesy of Carnegie Museum of Natural History Library and Archives.

Read responses from teachers and students at Schenley High School, the first school to host "We Humans." Document courtesy of Carnegie Museum of Natural History Section of Anthropology Archives.

March 1956

Eleanor Roosevelt praises it

First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt received a copy of the booklet from Swauger and praised it in her column "My Day," writing that "North and South alike must learn to evaluate human beings as such." Her column drew further interest.

June 1956

In the Courier

Ric Roberts wrote about the exhibit and its school tour in The Pittsburgh Courier. Its message — that humans differed by "type" but were fundamentally united and equal — resonated.

Ric Roberts, "Treasure Trove: School, Churchmen Agree 'Race' is Mythical," The Pittsburgh Courier, June 2, 1956. From newspapers.com.
November 1959

A national tour

With support from the American Jewish Committee and USW, a second portable version toured libraries nationwide. This month it opened at the San Francisco Public Library.

Frank Clarvoe, Jr. and Hazel McFarlane of the San Francisco Public Library (left) with William K. Coblentz of the San Francisco chapter of the American Jewish Committee (right) with the temporary installation of "We Humans." Courtesy of the University of Pittsburgh Library System's Archives & Special Collections (Francis C. Shane Papers, 1942-1969, AIS.1996.03).
September 1961

Miami

"We Humans" is displayed at the Miami Public Library in Florida, and a special about the exhibit airs on television there.

January 1962

Plainville, Connecticut

"We Humans" is displayed at Plainville High School in Connecticut.

October 1963

The Indiana Centennial

"We Humans" is displayed at the Indiana Centennial in Indianapolis.

"We Humans" on view in Indianapolis, 1963. Courtesy of the University of Pittsburgh Library System's Archives & Special Collections (Francis C. Shane Papers, 1942-1969, AIS.1996.03).
"We Humans" on view in Indianapolis, 1963.
April 1964

Detroit

"We Humans" is displayed at the Detroit Historical Museum as part of Labor Education Week.

October 1969

Swauger looks back

Almost fifteen years after the debut of "We Humans," curator James Swauger reflected on the experience of developing the exhibit in the article "The Museum as Teacher," published in Current Anthropology. Still largely approving of the exhibit, he admitted it had flaws, writing: "We had to take complex, abstract concepts and present them as bald statements that would arouse curiosity in a viewer."

Read Swauger's full article. Document courtesy of Carnegie Museum of Natural History Section of Anthropology Archives.

October 2014

Finding the Words

When Carnegie Museum of Natural History hosts the acclaimed traveling exhibit RACE: Are We So Different? staff organized a small display on "We Humans" titled "Finding the Words: Pittsburgh and the Early Civil Rights Movement," striking a largely celebratory tone and emphasizing the positive intentions and unexpected reach of "We Humans" in its moment.

September 2025

"We Humans" at 70

The exhibit "We Humans" at 70: Educating Pittsburgh on Race in the 1950s, organized by Deirdre Madeleine Smith (with Lindsey Kenny, then a University of Pittsburgh student and intern), opens at the Hyland Gallery at Hillman Library on the University of Pittsburgh campus. It shared the story of "We Humans" through original archival records and critical, reparative interpretation.

"We Humans" at 70: Educating Pittsburgh on Race in the 1950s. Hyland Gallery at Hillman Library, University of Pittsburgh. September 2025–July 2026. Photograph by Deirdre Madeleine Smith.
What was actually in "We Humans"?

The Original Panels

"We Humans" consisted of eight panels that were originally displayed in four, double-sided cases. Each case paired one panel ("Panel A") aimed at sharing information about human biology and genetics with another ("Panel B") focused on human culture. The authors of these panels, anthropologists and curators James Swauger and Don Dragoo, aimed to encourage audiences to question their ideas about race and their attachments to the logic of racism. They did so in ways that today appear outdated, inaccurate, and detrimental. Using bold rhetoric and graphics, museum artifacts, and mannequin heads, Swauger and Dragoo presented messages that awkwardly shift between racial division and harmony.

Click on the panels to the right to study their content and learn more.

We Humans, Case I, Panel A
The Original Panels

Eight Panels, Four Cases

Click any panel to enlarge and learn more.

Case I, Panel A

Case I, Panel A

In this first panel, Swauger and Dragoo both deconstructed and reinforced racial categories (a pattern throughout "We Humans"). They challenged their viewers to racially identify three mannequins each wearing "an American hat," thus suggesting that racial difference is not so easy (or relevant) to recognize. At the same time, they asserted that these categories were both real and knowable by anthropologists.

Case I, Panel B

Case I, Panel B

In this panel, Swauger and Dragoo claimed that while racism, or "ethnocentrism," is inherently human, it can also be overcome by knowledge and reflection. They pulled examples from throughout human history of people either embracing or dismissing ethnocentric ideas.

Case II, Panel A

Case II, Panel A

In this panel, the mannequin heads from the first panel appear again, this time culturally (and "racially") marked by different headdresses, all borrowed from the Carnegie Museum of Natural History's anthropology collection. While the intention may have been to suggest that people picked up on cultural rather than racial cues when they tried to categorize each other, Swauger and Dragoo also inaccurately racially categorized the cultures from which these headdresses came. They also divorced these items from their original context and meaning.

Case II, Panel B

Case II, Panel B

For this panel, Swauger and Dragoo selected, categorized and pinned to a board objects from the Carnegie Museum of Natural History's anthropology collections that are of a similar material and manufacture, but that come from different regions of the world. They intentionally left the items unlabeled in order to encourage viewers to question their ability to identify and judge the items in racial terms.

Case III, Panel A

Case III, Panel A

In this panel, Swauger and Dragoo use a modified graphic of a world map and simple, color-coded figurines to illustrate the idea of genetic variation due to geographic isolation. While they correctly identified geographic isolation as a driver of changes in outward appearance, they misidentified these variations as "racial" on a genetic level. They write that "Man's Birthplace" is unknown, but today we know that the human species (Homo sapiens) emerged in Africa.

Case III, Panel B

Case III, Panel B

In this example of a "cultural" panel, an image of a person who appears coded as white, male, and middle class sits before a hearty breakfast. With this pairing of text and image, Swauger and Dragoo attempted to demonstrate how incoherent racism is: people will espouse discriminatory views of a group of people while enjoying food or other cultural exports from that same group.

Case IV, Panel A

Case IV, Panel A

To produce this panel, James Swauger reached out to the World Health Organization to ask for examples of situations where a multi-racial coalition had collaborated to solve a health crisis. The panel focuses on Yaws, a bacterial infection that causes skin, tissue, and nerve damage. Through the evidence of Yaws, Swauger and Dragoo argued that not only do people of all races get sick with the same diseases, they also have the ability to work toward their cures.

Case IV, Panel B

Case IV, Panel B

In the final panel, Swauger and Dragoo equate human cultures to "designs for living," reaffirming the assertions from Case II, Panel B that all groups are equally valid in their approach to fundamental, and universal, aspects of how to survive and live as humans.

Conclusion & Reflection

The Contradiction at the Core

Both of these statements are true:

"We Humans" was an optimistic, collaborative response to racial turmoil that had a national impact on diverse audiences of students, workers, and other Americans with a message of equality, grounded in science, that was widely praised in its time.

"We Humans" was an effort by white men in positions of power to meet a moment of racial reckoning through an education campaign that masked structural racism behind condescending rhetoric that has since been disproved and largely forgotten.

These competing realities challenge audiences today to make sense of "We Humans," and similar projects that emerged in the aftermath of World War II and at the dawn of the Civil Rights Movement. This final section of the exhibit provides some additional context for you to consider, and invites you to reflect on what you have learned.

The United Steelworkers of America

"We Humans" was touched off by the labor union The United Steelworkers of America and events being organized by their Civil Rights Committee. That committee was formed as a result of Black worker-led organizing to advocate for better and safer opportunities for Black workers in industry. When the Committee was formed, none of those workers were placed in positions of leadership. Instead, the leadership consisted entirely of white men, including secretary Francis Shane who initiated the collaboration with James Swauger and Carnegie Museum of Natural History. Over time, Shane\u2019s emphasis on seminars and public education and efforts like "We Humans" became increasingly frustrating to Black workers who felt that the Civil Rights Committee had proved ineffectual at securing their safety and advancement.

The City of Pittsburgh

Mayor David L. Lawrence\u2019s \u201CCivic Unity Council\u201D was a key partner in the development of "We Humans," and was the entity that contracted with the Carnegie Museum to co-produce and host the initial exhibit. The Mayor\u2019s Council was officially tasked with promoting positive relations between racial, religious and other groups, and its activities included reports on housing and investigations into police brutality.

In 1955, the same year that Lawrence\u2019s administration presented a message of racial and social unity with "We Humans," it approved actions that had disproportionate negative impacts on Black and other minority citizens. As part of his signature urban renewal plans, Lawrence allowed for the demolition of the Lower Hill District to make way for the Civic Arena (itself demolished in 2011). This resulted in the displacement of 8,000 residents, including 1,239 Black families.

Pittsburgh Public Schools

Students hearing the messages of "We Humans" in their social studies classes had to reconcile them with their lives in a multi-racial, but in many contexts segregated, city where they would have encountered or witnessed forms of racism daily. They were also likely aware of the galvanizing events in the history of civil rights and race relations in the U.S. that were happening in the same years, including: the lynching of Emmett Till (August 1955), the Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955\u20131956), and the ongoing events and debates that surrounded the desegregation of schools after the Supreme Court decision striking down legal segregation in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).

Scholar and author Ralph Proctor, Jr. (1938\u20132024) was born and raised in Pittsburgh\u2019s Hill District and attended Schenley High School in the same years that "We Humans" was taught there. In Proctor\u2019s experience, Schenley was a school where he and other Black students faced rampant discrimination by teachers and administrators. Later, he earned his doctorate at University of Pittsburgh where he wrote a dissertation on racial discrimination against Black teachers and professionals in Pittsburgh Public Schools. In it, he cited statistics showing that in the years that he attended Schenley, while the Black student population increased, the white student population decreased, and there were few Black teachers.

Conclusion & Reflection

Reflection

The following questions are offered for you to reflect on what you have learned about "We Humans." Answer as many or few as you wish. When you are done, you may download your responses, or submit them to be shared. Your responses may be used in future publications or even featured on this site.

Familiarity

What feels most familiar to you about "We Humans"? Have you encountered any similar education campaigns or exhibits in your life?

Surprise

What feels most unfamiliar, or surprising, about "We Humans"?

Today

Do you think a project like "We Humans" could happen today? Imagine how such a project might play out in your own social and political context.

Forgetting

Why do you think projects like "We Humans" have been forgotten over time?

The Future

What will people in the future say about the efforts at education on race and racism of your time?

Action

How are you called to address racism and prejudice in your moment?

Save your reflection

Prompt: How are you called to address racism and prejudice in your moment?

Your saved responses

These responses are tied to your account and this reflection.

Curator Deirdre Madeleine Smith in front of the We Humans exhibit, 2025
Curator Deirdre Madeleine Smith in front of the "We Humans" exhibit in Hyland Gallery, 2025. Photograph by Ron Idoko.
About

About this exhibit

This exhibit was developed in 2025–2026 by Deirdre Madeleine Smith, a Teaching Assistant Professor in the History of Art and Architecture Department at the University of Pittsburgh and Curator of Museum Studies and Art at Carnegie Museum of Natural History. An earlier version was hosted in the Hyland Gallery at Hillman Library, co-curated by student intern Lindsey Kenny with University of Pittsburgh Library System staff Megan Massanelli and Madeleine Chesek-Welch.

About

Credits, Acknowledgements & Sources

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the following individuals for their support in the development of this project:

Gretchen Baker, Jenise Brown, Marie Corrado, Amy Covell-Murthy, Sarah Crawford, Sydney Dominick, Christopher Fleisher, Kristina Gaugler, Laurie Giarratani, Ron Idoko, Morgan Riggenbach, Keirstin Rotharmel, Ellen Sanin, Rachel Thomas-Beckel, Breann Thompson, Annick Vuissoz, Amy Whipple, Ginger White, Gina Winstead.

Sources consulted and recommended

Archives:

Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Section of Anthropology Archives.

Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Library & Archives.

Heinz History Center, Pittsburgh Public Schools Records.

University of Pittsburgh Library System Archives & Special Collections, Francis C. Shane Papers, 1942–1969.

Books & articles:

Anthony Hazard, Postwar Anti-racism (Palgrave, 2012).

James B. Stewart, "Civil Rights and Organized Labor" (2005).

Tracy Teslow, Constructing Race (Cambridge, 2014).

Joe W. Trotter Jr. & Jared N. Day, Race and Renaissance (Pittsburgh, 2010).